may i ask you the reason why South Korea is unfortunate? Do you think South Korean government not making any responses to China's "one-way diplomatic policy" as a right decision of one country? let's be sensible. If your neighbor comes into your house and claim that your yard is his with no "specific and right" reasons. Are you simply going to say, "fine, take it, go ahead?" It is a better decision at least to claim and state your right and stance despite the fact that there might be backlashes and problems in the future. that's what is called "diplomatic conflict."
我想问你,为什么韩国这么做是不幸的?你认为韩国政府不应向中国的“单边外交政策”做任何响应,那样才是正确的决定吗?理智点吧,如果你的邻居进入你的房子,没有正当理由就声称你的院子是他的。你会不会说, “没问题,是你的了,随便啦”。至少你要表明你的权利和立场吧,就算这么做导致将来会产生摩擦和问题,这么做也是正确的决定。这就是所谓的“外交冲突”。
You're right. Join the arms race and see who comes out ahead 20 years from now.
你说得对。那加入军备竞赛吧,看看20年后谁会胜出。
中韩关系未来将越来越密切
美国网友对韩国设立防空识别区的评论-02
And you think China would be irrational enough to bring this militaristic conflicts when its military and economy needs further development and improvement? And when there is US which plans to expand its influence in the region? When you know the history, it looks awfully similar of the Cold War which never ended up with direct conflicts
中国的军事和经济需要进一步发展和完善,你认为中国会丧失理智无故挑起可能的军事冲突?还记得美国是什么时候开始扩大在东亚地区的影响力吗?如果你了解历史,就会知道现在的情况看起来非常类似于没有正面冲突的冷战。
东风31洲际弹道导弹
I wasn't talking about a conflict. I am, however, talking about influence and the ability for the other Asian countries (with US backing) to intimidate China.
Lets not forget, the US is tied to the treaties with South Korea, Japan, and the Philippines. Those treaties can be revised at any time. A future generation of Americans may feel differently about defense pacts in the Pacific 20 years from now.
我说的不是冲突。我是说其他亚洲国家在美国的支持下“吓唬”中国的能力和效果。
不要忘了,美国虽然与韩国,日本和菲律宾签有防御条约,但这些条约可以在任何时候修改。也许20年后,未来一代的美国人可能会对现在的太平洋地区的防御条约有不同的看法。
And I didn't bring up the word "Cold War", you did.
If China has the following 20 years from now; 1) use of her own currency in global trade 2) a complete network of the latest satellites 3) technology industry independent from the outside world, China will not need to be so intimidated.
As of now, though, she is reliant on many of the things the US and Western allies provide, i.e., satellite, currency, and technology.
而且我并没有提到“冷战” ,是你提出的。
2024-11-14 10:29:55
2024-11-14 10:22:36
2024-11-13 09:26:00
2024-11-13 09:31:22
2024-11-11 10:23:52
2024-11-11 10:21:06
2024-11-08 10:53:47
2024-11-08 10:49:55
2024-11-06 10:43:30
2024-11-06 10:35:57
2024-11-05 09:45:15
2024-11-05 09:49:44